Cosmology · field mechanisms

AntiMatter

Why does the Universe contain much more matter than antimatter? AntiMatter explores whether a chain of interacting fields could help explain that imbalance, while testing symmetry, energy and cosmological constraints.

Public research updated 2 October 2026 · latest archive v1.23.1

Read this first

Research status

A public working hypothesis and computational audit. Successful baryogenesis and a completed theory of everything are not established.

What the public work reports

A source that fails a stated symmetry test

The specified compact gauged-scalar source construction encounters a symmetry obstruction. This is a result for that field content and its assumptions, not a universal impossibility proof.

A conditional alternative

A Wilson-line construction matches a desired long variation scale under stated assumptions. Its full particle content, anomaly cancellation, thermal history and driving mechanism still require construction.

The energy cost matters

Necessary energy bounds tighten as response efficiency decreases. At the original benchmark, the motion costs more energy than the proposed source supplies. Satisfying a bound alone would not supply a viable mechanism.

Replay evidence

The preserved v1.23 replay reproduced 21 numerical CSV tables, including source and parent-verification tables. Archive-integrity checks and separate computational reviews accompany the newer diagnostics. Reproducing these numbers checks the calculation pipeline in the tested environment; physical validity remains a separate question.

Assumptions and open questions

A viable construction must avoid excess stable particles, excess field energy and persistent boundaries between vacuum states. The recorded replay checked the parent archive for integrity but did not independently rerun its physics. Rendering-dependent outputs are qualified in the reproducibility report.

Kinetic and source-duration checks · 1 October 2026

A follow-up candidate checks an assumed kinetic matrix and a source-only energy budget through cosmic expansion. The charge-correlated metric preserves the long field scale while moving the smallest heavy mass from 213.753471 to 207.018544 GeV. The actual quantum correction still requires physical matching.

In a separate fixed-cosine diagnostic, sustaining a stipulated speed threshold proportional to temperature for 0.1 e-fold ending at the electroweak benchmark requires winding at least 45 at unit response efficiency; one e-fold requires at least 156. These are conditional necessary bounds, not a prediction of the matter excess. Both calculations have separate computational cross-checks; this is not external peer review.

Read code, results, assumptions and reviews ↗. These v1.23.2 follow-up calculations are public on GitHub. The latest published Zenodo archive remains v1.23.1; an archive update is in preparation and awaits metadata and file-upload repair. Successful baryogenesis remains unestablished.

Signed transport diagnostic · 1 October 2026

A separate three-species example checks how conserved charges, susceptibility, reaction rates and the signed source history determine a response. Equal positive and negative source intervals can leave a residual because their response weights differ; reactions that remain active can wash it out. Independent calculations agree on all 201 trajectory samples.

The species are illustrative labels, and the calculation does not predict a baryon abundance or solve expanding cosmology. A physical application still needs an action-derived source, actual particle content, thermal rates and an energy reservoir. Read the transport round and its reproduction evidence ↗.

Standard Model charge audit · 2 October 2026

The newest research round derives the exact ideal symmetric-plasma response to an assumed derivative interaction with the baryon-plus-lepton current (B+L): n_B = (28/79)n_(B-L) + (72/79)T²κ, with κ = c dθ₀/dt for the assumed interaction with the externally prescribed phase θ₀. This assumes equilibrated Standard Model reactions, hypercharge neutrality and fixed conserved flavor charges. Separate computational methods agree; their execution was not fully blinded.

The interaction still needs matching to the Wilson construction. Its autonomous source, physical CP sign, response across the electroweak crossover and final baryon yield remain open. The charge algebra is conventional, and this working research makes no novelty or successful baryogenesis claim.

A targeted full-text review of a recent induced-electroweak-wall paper ↗ identifies useful finite-rate, energy-reservoir, sign-cancellation and susceptibility-matching questions. Its scalar and Higgs model provides a comparator; transferring its result to this hypothesis requires additional construction.

Read the operator round ↗ for the derivation, data, reproduction instructions and recorded review limits. This calculation extends the public working research; the original v1.23.1 archive and calculation files remain preserved.

Repeatable research rounds

A Linux service package is prepared and mock-tested to begin another bounded research round after a verified completed checkpoint. Deployment on a persistent external host remains inactive; authenticated model execution and uninterrupted 24/7 operation have not been verified. Read the runner package, mock checks and deployment limits ↗.

Read the source materials

The repository documentation is the primary source for this overview.

Archives and citation

Maldonado, Ricardo. (2026). AntiMatter: Wilson-Line and Cosmology Audit - Efficiency-Dependent Energy Bounds and Reproducibility (v1.23.1). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22400470. This remains the latest published archive. The October 2026 follow-up calculations are available on GitHub; a further Zenodo version is in preparation. These computational checks do not establish external peer review, a successful baryon yield or active continuous AI operation.

Overview prepared from public documentation on 30 September 2026; working research summaries updated 2 October 2026. Consult the cited source version for full statements, qualifications and reuse terms. Author: Ricardo Maldonado.