Read this first
Research status
A hypothesis, methods and reproducibility release. It establishes neither an HRF detection nor a quantum horizon, area quantization or an exact ln(4) identification.
What the public work reports
An exact-point testing limit
Under the stated total-variation continuity condition, alternatives can approach an exact target so closely that uniform separation vanishes. This does not rule out learning about fixed, separated alternatives.
A repeatable archived calculation
The fixed-conditioning −7M replay contains an 85 × 40 grid. Its released-row network maximum is 200 Hz, 450 s⁻¹; an alternate released row gives 200 Hz, 420 s⁻¹. Several inputs change together, so this does not isolate a causal parameter effect.
Agreement within the computation
The archived centered cache-to-raw maximum discrepancy is below 7.8 × 10⁻⁵ log-likelihood units. This supports the specified computation, not independent astrophysical confirmation.
Assumptions and open questions
Gaussian separation calculations are stipulated design requirements, not measured GW250114 precision. Full nuisance, calibration, global identification and search-null calibration questions remain unresolved. Integrity checks do not run a new raw-strain analysis.
Read the source materials
The repository documentation is the primary source for this overview.
Archives and citation
Maldonado, Ricardo. (2026). Quantized Horizon Response (HRF): Composite-Alternative Separation and Fixed-Conditioning GW250114 Replay — v5.3. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22400638. The GitHub companion preserves the published scientific archive; it is not a new analysis.
Overview prepared from public documentation on 30 September 2026. Consult the cited source version for full statements, qualifications and reuse terms. Author: Ricardo Maldonado.